Back in the day of studying Sociology at Salford University, for the Medis Audiences module I decided to do an audience analysis of Radio 1 listeners. And this is the result, split between people foolish enough to be interviewed in Salford Uni and may home town of Thornbury (You know who you are!Thanks to, Jenstuds, Jenny, Lucy, Chris, Debbie, Martin, Marc, Jay, Emma and Vlad. Oooppss! That may well have blown everyone's cover.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY
3. DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
A. Uses and Gratifications
3.1 Listening Time and Social Context
3.2 Specific Shows
3.3 Other Radio Stations.
3.4 Records
B. Effects
3.5 Effects of hearing a record on Radio
1
3.6 Effects of further promotion.
CONCLUSIONS
DEFICENCIES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. INTRODUCTION
Radio 1 is one of if not the most popular
radio station in the country. Since the
mid-1960s it has treated listeners to a mix of
new pop music possibly more diverse than its
rivals, and a host of DJs which over the years
have included the likes of Kenny Everett, Noel
Edmonds, and John Peel. However, (as describer
in Garfield, 1998) in 1993 incoming station
controller Matthew Bannister felt the station
had lost touch with its core youth audience.
Bannister to reverse the trend set about
repositioning the station, making it more
important to youth culture, reflecting in the
introduction of a portfolio of new dance DJs
such as Pete Tong, and the stations support of
Britpop. After a radical fall in listeners, the
station has now stabilized, with audiences on
the increase again, and as a result can be
described as having recaptured the interest of
its core audience of 16-24 year olds. At the
same time the station has been at the heart of
new music trends throughout the 1990s, in its
promotion of new acts and artists.
The aim of this project is in two parts.
Firstly, why is it youth audiences listen to
Radio 1? What do they gain from it? Secondly,
what effect exactly does Radio 1 have on its
audience? In order to discover this, I have
combined the two audience research procedures of
the behavioral paradigm; uses and
gratifications, and effects. This is reflected
in the title of the project, having undergone a
change from the original title 'Radio 1- Still
the Nations Favourite?' (referred to in the
proposal) as this was thought to be too
ambiguous in relation to the actual point of the
project. Interviews with ten Radio 1 listeners
have been carried out in order to discuss these
themes. In addition, a number of assumptions
Radio 1 has of its audience which are of
relevance to this project will be explored
(outlined in Frith, 1978, Garfield, 1998). These
are:
1. The audience generally listens to Radio 1
while performing other activities
2. Listening is fragmented. Audiences only
listen for certain periods
3. Audience members tend to tune in for
specific shows
4. Radio 1 has an effect on its audience
through the music it plays, encouraging the
audience to buy such records
These assumptions will be referred back to
again in the conclusion. The uses and
gratifications section will explore when and how
the audience members listen to Radio 1. The
reasons why they listen to Radio 1, such as the
DJs and the music played, looking at both
daytime and evening Radio 1 programmes. As way
of comparison, other radio stations audience
members listen to will be discussed in terms of
what they offer that Radio 1 lacks and vice
versa, and also to be discussed will be how
listening to the radio differs to listening to
records. The effects' section will explore the
effect on the audience' record purchases through
the music played on Radio 1. Both, the daytime
play list when Radio 1 gets its biggest
audience, and the music played in the specialist
shows at the evenings and weekends will be
discussed. In addition, further forms of
promotion will be discussed, within and outside
Radio 1, taking into account other forms of
music media.
2. METHODOLOGY
My original intention for this project as
stated in the proposal was to carry out a number
of individual interviews with Radio 1 listeners
(although at this point I had failed to state
how many audience members I was intending to
interview). However on carrying out the research
I decided to switch to conducting interviews in
the form of group discussions with audience
members, in a similar way to Longhurst and
Carrabine (2000) in their study of music
audiences. In a group environment, especially
friendship groups, respondents are able to play
off each others comments, which can lead them to
revealing more than they would in a one on one
interview, and respondents are more likely to
talk in a relaxed free flowing manner. Therefore
the project entailed interviews with 10 audience
members in total, all of which were situated
toward the upper end of the 16-24 target
audience. These were broken down into discussion
groups of five, two, and three respondents in
total. Group discussions were carried out on
Monday 24th April, Sunday April 30th Friday
5th.May 2000. Throughout the project,
respondents are referred to by their initials
only. The 2 main aims of the project were broken
down into the following subsections:
A. Uses and Gratifications
1. Listening Time and Social Context. When do
audience members listen to Radio 1, and for how
long? Do audience members listen to Radio 1
while performing other activities, and if so
what?
2. Specific Shows. Do the audience members'
listen to particular shows on Radio 1 and if so
for what reasons? e.g. DJs, music?
3. Other radio stations. Do the audience
members listen to other radio stations? e.g.
local, national What do they have to offer that
Radio 1 doesn't?
4. Records. How does listening to records
differ from listening to Radio 1?
B. Effects
5. Effect of hearing a record played on Radio
1. How likely are the audience members to buy
this record?
6. Further promotion. Radio 1 sessions,
concerts. Other music media
Each discussion broadly followed these
categories of analysis. Each discussion was
recorded and lasted no more than 15 minutes
each. A full transcript from the first
discussion group can be found in the
appendix.
3. DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
A. Uses and Gratifications
3.1 Listening Times & Social Context
Listening times were invariably found to be
linked to social context. Audience members
disclosed that they were most likely to tune
into Radio 1 when they were performing other
activities.
CH revealed that he usually listened to Radio
1 when he was in the car, the time of day
however tended to vary. CH said he usually
listened for: "Half an hour, say max.
Though if it's both ways, it's really an
hour"
Radio 1 often acted as a background to
performing work activities. DJ said she listened
to Radio 1 while she was "copying up notes,
or trying to finish an essay". Similarly CH
and JA found Radio 1 a useful background
distraction while revising for exams
3.2 Specific Shows
Despite audience members tending to have
Radio 1 on as a background distraction to other
activities, there were specific shows on Radio 1
the audience members would tune in especially
for. It was found that during the day, audience
members would tune into Radio 1 to hear specific
DJs.
LE listened to Mark & Lard on a daily
basis, describing them as "cool".
Audience members often liked listening to
such DJs, because they made them laugh. For
example, Chris Moyles was a popular choice
amongst a number of respondents, because DJ
"He's funny, cos he's dead sarcastic"
Another respondent said:
JB "I listen to it (Radio 1) when
they've got that very funny rude man on. I don't
know what he's called though. What's he called?
The fat one."
MT "Chris Moyles."
JB "Yeah, Chris Moyles. He is
funny."
MJ would regularly tune into Radio 1 for
Simon Mayo, because: "He's the man. He's
very in touch with student culture."
Some respondents disclosed that they would
listen to DJs even if they sometimes found them
to be irritating. For example, Chris Moyles:
CH "Oh no, he really annoys me. I don't
like him."
MT "I think him himself is a bit of a
knob. But him and Melinda, and Comedy Dave are
quite good."
CH "Oh yeah, when they're together they
put a funny show together, yeah."
LE disliked many of the Radio 1 DJs: "I
hate the way Radio 1's going. Sara Cox and Chris
Moyles. If they get rid of Mark & Lard, I'll
stop listening all together."
LE later revealed that she preferred some of
the past DJs no longer with the station, such as
Nicky Campball: "He's a better interviewer.
Better than Jo Whiley (another Radio 1 DJ). He
used to have good guests. Stephen Fry. The good
old days."
The music the station played during the day
didn't seem to be a prime reason for tuning in;
the play list in particular came under fire for
playing too much pop music:
PW "All the cheap release boy bands you
have to wade through, and occasionally they play
a good thing. When the DJ chooses it, it's okay,
though the play list tends to be a bit an arse
really."
Later, PW argued that Radio 1 should maybe
play more alternative music, unlike the same
types of pop music all the commercial stations
seemed to play:
PW "But they (Radio 1) can play an
alternative. They should, but they don't."
CH "They have to play what the majority
wants to hear."
JA "They can afford to have a few
alternative programmes, but most people don't
listen to them."
Similarly disillusioned with Radio 1's play
list, LE placed the blame further afield:
Would you say you're disillusioned with Radio
1?
LE "Not Radio 1 specifically, but the
music industry. They only play what's popular.
The charts have been saturated with pap pop
music."
LE went on to state such pop groups as:
"Britney Spears, Billie, S Club 7."
However in the evenings or at weekends,
respondents were more likely to tune into Radio
1 for the music they played than the DJs,
because it is at such times that the specialist
shows are broadcast:
DJ "Because John Peel plays really good,
different stuff compared to daytime. All
different sorts; and the Rock Show, because I
like Rock music."
In some cases, the specialist DJs themselves
were treated with less than respect by
respondents despite the music they played:
JR "I find I tune into Judge Jules and
Pete Tong (dance DJs) quite a lot."
MJ "They are quite bad DJs."
JR "They're quite funny as well. You've
gotta admit some of the stuff Judge Jules comes
out with is absolutely hilarious. He makes a
complete cock of himself every time he's on the
radio. How can you not fault the guy?"
MJ "Cos he's a cock!"
Other respondents found themselves put off
the specialist shows, as they tended to play
more obscure types of music than during the day,
when the station receives its highest audiences.
For example, MT on Dave's Pearce's dance show:
"It's a bit too much, cos it's a bit too
dancey, and trancey, rather than more laid back
kinda pop music."
JA meanwhile had this to say: "I
listened once to John Peel cos (name withheld)
told me to when I was 17, and it was awful. I
just don't like the music they play."
3.3 Other radio stations
Most respondents said they listened to other
radio stations on a regular basis. JB was more
likely to listen to commercial radio stations
than Radio 1 because: "They always play the
music I like (pop music). Whereas on Radio 1
they have periods when they play dance
music."
Similarly, EP preferred listening to
commercial stations: "It's from when I went
to school, always listened to them on the school
bus."
However, other respondents saw commercial
stations as particularly off putting compared to
Radio 1. Here's MT on why he prefers listening
to Radio 1 than commercial stations:
"Cos you don't get crappy adverts in
between. GWR (a Bristol based commercial
station) you get all the adverts, which just
drives you mad. I listen to a radio station for
the DJs and music, not adverts."
MJ argued that even though Radio 1 played
similar music to commercial stations during the
day, he'd still rather listen to Radio 1,
because: "The DJs are more constructive (on
Radio 1). If you listen to Galaxy (a commercial
dance station) then it's really like monotonous.
It's not funny, it's just banal."
A number of respondents listened to other
national stations, because there offered
different types of music, and could serve
different purposes to Radio 1.
MJ "If I'm working then I'll listen to a
bit of Classic FM, and don't laugh, but if I'm
in a sexy mood then I'll listen to a bit of Jazz
FM."
LE also liked listening to Radio 2: "I
prefer the DJs. Terry Wogan and Jonathan Ross.
Jonathan Ross is really cool. He's dead funny. I
suppose he's like a Southern Mark &
Lard."
Some respondents listened to non-music radio
stations, as they found they had much to offer
that Radio 1 didn't.
PW "I only listen to Radio 1 when I'm at
work. Otherwise I'll listen to Radio 4. Cos it's
got some good comedy shows on it, and the news
service is the best you can get."
5Live was also popular among respondents.
LE "You get live footy matches on it. I
heard it this morning analysing the Election
results. That's good. Except when they slagged
off Manchester."
5Live was also praised for its news service
(JA), and it's discussion programmes (CH).
3.4 Records
Respondents viewed listening to records
differently to how they viewed listening to
Radio 1, or the radio in general. When
respondents specifically wanted to listen to
music, the playing of ones own records was
viewed more favourably.
DJ "CDs are music that you want to
listen to. It's your choice. Radio isn't your
choice of music."
MJ went further, stating that he tended to
listen to records to create a certain mood,
something Radio 1 couldn't provide. He also
said: "You can switch the radio on, you
know what's coming, and you know its gonna piss
you off. This is a cynic talking. If you've got
your own CD collection, I tend to go for stuff
that's a little more interesting, a little more
structured."
However, CH pointed out that the radio was
useful for finding out about music you didn't
own, such as forthcoming releases and new acts.
B. Effects
3.5 Effect of hearing a record on Radio 1
The likelihood of audience members buying a
record they've heard on Radio 1 tended to depend
on the types of music they liked. Respondents
were found to have fixed ideas about specific
types of music they liked or disliked, which had
a knock on effect on the types of music they
would likely buy.
PW summed this point up well: "I tend to
know what I like. I suppose if I hear a band I
like on Radio 1, and go, ahh, there's a new
record coming out, then I'll think about looking
for it in the record shop. Some bands I may not
have heard before, but I like. It's not some
sort of hypnotic effect. You don't find me going
out and buying Billie or anything."
JR was a respondent who was more likely to
buy less mainstream types of dance music, not
usually played during the day, but more likely
found in the specialist shows: "Some of the
dance stuff. Like on Pete Tong's show. It's not
the sort of stuff you'd get on Sara Cox's show
(breakfast DJ)."
Even though she liked the pop music played on
Radio, JB said she was still unlikely to buy any
of it, putting economic factors as a reason:
"I only get CDs if someone buys them for
me. They're so expensive. It's like £14.
I'd rather spend it on something else."
LE was more likely to tape songs off the
Radio 1 she liked, as opposed to buying them,
again because of financial factors. The only
likelihood of buying a single she liked was if
it included other attractions: "I buy it if
it's £1.99, not £3.99; unless it's
got a CD ROM or free postcards."
CH however liked listening to types of music
on Radio 1 that he wouldn't buy. However, If a
record received too much airplay on Radio 1,
then this could put audience members off buying
it.
MJ "If you hear a single on the radio,
and you think that's a good song, then you hear
it day after day after day. Overplayed, so in
the end you don't go and buy it."
MJ was also unlikely to buy more specialist
types of music, because he now felt out of
depth, unable to keep up with ever changing
music scenes that were deemed to be more
'underground' than mainstream. "When I was
younger, when I was really into indie and rock
stuff, I'd listen to Steve Lamacq (Evening
Session DJ). That made you want to go out and
buy the stuff, but you had to be really into the
scene to get something out of it."
3.6 Effects of further promotion
Audience members tended to see record airplay
on Radio 1 as part of a wider marketing strategy
in the promotion of records; with the aim of
pursuding the audiences to buy such products.
Artists could gain further promotion on Radio 1
for example through interviews, or sessions: The
effectiveness of such devices was seen to be
variable:
LE "I actually went out and bought the
Doves (album) cos of a session on Radio 1, but
that's about it."
Other forms of record promotion outside Radio
1 were also seen to be important. Magazines such
as 'Smash Hits' (EP), or the NME (LE), where the
audience could further there knowledge about
different acts, in some cases pursuding them to
buy such records.
JR talked about how Radio 1 could act as a
route into a particular music scene:
"I first heard Goldie (a drum 'n' bass
artist) in about '91, and that was on Radio 1
actually. Simon Mayo played it, and it was about
31 in the charts. F**kin' hell that was a top
tune. And then after that a lad at college was a
drum 'n' bass DJ and he gave me loads of tapes,
and I went out on loads of drum 'n' bass nights,
stuff like that."
This suggests that JB had made a conscious
effort to pursue this interest, rather than
Radio 1 or the music media in general acting as
a one way effect. Indeed, throughout this
section, respondents have indicated that the
effect of Radio 1 on its audience is limited,
the consumer having some autonomy over what
records they intend to buy.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Far from being final, the findings from this
project can be said to have only scratched the
surface of: A. The uses and gratifications
audience members gain form Radio 1, and B. The
effects Radio 1 is deemed to have on its
audience, from an audience perspective.
Nevertheless some conclusive remarks can be
made, and the assumptions Radio 1 has of its
audience outlined in the introduction can be
examined to a certain extent. Referring back to
the question laid out in the introduction 'Why
do people listen to Radio 1?' a whole range of
different reasons were discussed by the audience
members, which were invariably linked to the
assumptions Radio 1 had of its audience. The
majority of respondents discussed Radio 1 in
terms as a backdrop to other activities such as
work, in doing so backing up this assumption. In
most cases audience members expressed that their
listening habits with Radio 1 tended to be
fragmentary, listening for only limited periods,
backing up the second assumption. Also in line
with the third assumption, the majority of
audience members who said they listened to Radio
1 regularly, said they had certain shows they
would tune in especially to listen to, whether
it be for certain DJs such as Chris Moyles, or
types of music from specialist shows such as
John Peel. However for all respondents, Radio 1
was found to be not enough to sate their uses
and gratifications. Audience members admitted to
turning to other radio stations such as Classic
FM or 5Live as they provided what Radio 1
didn't, whether it be different types of music,
or non musical features such as football
commentary, or news coverage. Also a large
number of respondents would choose their own
record collections over Radio 1 or radio in
general, when they wanted to listen to music in
a more structured way. With reference to Radio 1
acting as a promotional vehicle in pursuding
audiences to purchase particular records,
audience members expressed a preference for only
set types of music whether it is pop, indie,
rock, or dance. Therefore these were the genres
of music respondents were likely to buy. In some
cases however, audience members said they were
unlikely to buy records whether they liked them
or not. This therefore seems to suggest that
Radio 1 doesn't simply act as a one way effect;
that respondents can actively use the station as
a way of developing musical tastes, and
discovering new artists. However the final
assumption that Radio 1 does have some effect on
its audience could be confirmed. In addition
though, Radio 1 was seen as part of a wider
promotional industry for records and artists,
which included other forms of media such as
magazines and television programmes. Such media
was also found to be at the audience's disposal,
but could also cumulate in pursuding audience
members to make purchases of records.
5. DEFICENCIES
The effects section of the project can be
deemed to be relatively underdeveloped in
comparison to the uses and gratifications
section. Not enough attention was paid to how
the music media in general effects the
audience's record purchases, especially in the
first group discussion. A major area not covered
in any detail in the project, but should
definitely have been put under consideration is
the added effect of peer groups on the formation
of musical tastes on the audience. Therefore it
can be said that the project may have given the
misconception that only the music media such as
Radio 1 has the ability to promote and
disseminate information about records; and that
peers have no part in informing others of
correct record purchases. The majority of
respondents were found to have anti-pop music
attitudes, especially towards acts likely to
feature in the Top 10 singles charts, such as S
Club 7 and Billie. Or other respondents, who
confessed a liking to pop music, however
suggested that they were unlikely to purchase
such records. Therefore this begs the question,
who buys such records? and can Radio 1 be said
too be a prime player in the promotion of such
pop acts? Part of the problem could lie with the
fact that all respondents were located in the
upper half of Radio 1's target audience of
16-24. A project where the respondents were
evenly spread across this age band may have
revealed more. In addition interviews with Radio
1 listeners who fall outside this age bracket
could have provided same data for
comparison.
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY
FRITH, Simon (1978) The Sociology of Rock,
Constable, London
GARFIELD, Simon (1998) The Nation's
Favourite, Faber & Faber, London
LONGHURST & CARRABINE, in GONOW &
WARDE (2000) Ordinary Consumption